Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Pecanic

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 28, 1998No. 1CA-CV 96-0615PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Judge.

¶ 1 We hold that a defendant who is jointly and severally liable for an intentional tort with a co-tortfeasor is entitled to have an adverse judgment reduced by the amount of any settlement reached with the settling eotortfeasor. Because the trial court interpreted Arizona’s version of the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (UCATA) to the contrary, we reverse in part.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 The facts relevant to this appeal are undisputed. The appellees Mathew and Chad Bishop are brothers. Mathew attended high school at Scottsdale Christian Academy.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Drozda v. McComasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Patricia L. Pratt, Cross-Appellant v. National Distillers & Chemical Corporation, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McEvoy v. Aerotek, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Jamerson v. QuinteroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. Ida v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. McEvoy v. Aerotek, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API