Baker v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
KRUEGER, Judge.
Conviction is for theft of turkeys; punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of 100 days and a fine of $200.
There are no bills of exception in the record, nor any objections to the court’s charge. However, in a supplemental brief, appellant complains of the court’s charge relative to the suspension of the sentence. He contends that the charge is too restrictive and deprived him of a valuable legal right. We are in accord with him. The court’s charge on the subject reads as follows: “Our statute provides that where a person is charged with the offense…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Sulak v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Villa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- McCoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Punchard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Herriage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
- May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Asim Shakur Rahim v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.