Legal Opinion

Sulak v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1931No. 14160PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is making a false entry in a book of a state bank; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for six years.

As shown by bill of exception No. 1, appellant moved to quash the indictment on the ground that it was not returned by a legally constituted grand jury. We quote the qualification of the court appended to the bill of exception as follows

“At the time defendant’s motion to quash said indictment was called to the attention of the court and overruled by me, I learned for the first time that the clerk had not then entered on the minutes of said court the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Putnam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Williams v. Kansas City Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Punchard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Singleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Jewell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API