Thompson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Judge.
—Conviction is for robbery by the nse of a deadly weapon, punishment being assessed at death.
No bills of exception appear in the record. There seems to have been no objection whatever to the charge of the court, and no special charges were requested.
The sole question suggested is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction and penalty. In the month of June, 1921 there lived in the town of Navasota one B. Isenberg; his son-in-law, Ben Silverstein and his wife, the daughter of Isenberg, living with him. Isenberg and Silverstein were engaged together in business of…
2Cited by22 opinions
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Sulak v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Jewell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.