Legal Opinion

Adams v. Seaman

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1890No. 13443PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff upon what he alleges to be a negotiable promissory note made.by defendant Seaman to the order of one O. S. Hub-bell, and indorsed and assigned by Hubbell to plaintiff before maturity. Seaman, in his answer, pleads as set-off certain debts due him from Hubbell before the assignment. Plaintiff demurred to this part of the answer, and his demurrer was overruled. After trial, the court allowed certain of these set-offs, and gave judgment for plaintiff only for the balance due on the note, after deducting the set-offs. Plaintiff appeals from the" judgment. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of Woodland v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Chase v. WhitmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cornish v. WoolvertonMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Meyer v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Stadler v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Prescott v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Wood v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API