Legal Opinion

Nast v. Lockett

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 11, 1988No. 91, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES E. ORTH, Jr., Judge,

Specially Assigned.

This appeal revolves around the propriety of submitting to the trier of fact in an automobile accident case the allowance of punitive damages against a drinking driver.

I

Three cars were involved in the accident. One was driven by Lois Ann Lockett, the second by Charles Carroll Houck, and the third by Edward P. Nast. About 8:30 p.m. on 17 February 1984, Lockett was heading south in the southbound lane of York Road near its intersection with Lambourne Road in Baltimore County, Maryland. Nast was about 10 car lengths behind her. Houck was heading…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. H & R BLOCK, INC. v. TestermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Smith v. Gray Concrete Pipe Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Clay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. State v. LoscombCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Cummings v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Boyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Fraidin v. WeitzmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API