Legal Opinion
ROSE v. FERRARI NORTH AMERICA, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 14, 2025No. 2:21-cv-20772Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JEFFREY ROSE et al., Civil Action No. 21-20772(JKS)(CLW) Plaintiffs, v. OPINION FERRARI NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al., March 14, 2025 Defendants. SEMPER, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Ferrari North America, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Ferrari”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (ECF 160, “SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF 170-1, “Def. Br.”) Plaintiffs filed a brief in opposition. (ECF 177, “Opp.”) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF 179, “Reply.”) The Court reviewed…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.