United States v. Marek S. Radomski
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
Marek Radomski was convicted by a jury of conspiring to sell the illegal drug Ecstasy, and the judge sentenced him to 78 months in prison. He argues that there was insufficient evidence to convict him. The government emphasizes that the jury was correctly instructed and that (of course) its verdict was unanimous — and comes close to suggesting that the guilty verdict of a correctly instructed jury is sacrosanct.
The defendant’s coconspirator, Zawis-towski, was in all likelihood an Ecstasy dealer, and unlike Radomski he pleaded guilty (and received a slightly longer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. DazeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Cleotha Johnson, Reginald Johnson, Also Known as Fats, Dwight Johnson, S.T. Cross, Jr., and Regina RamseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. James Badger, Roscoe Foreman, Marcia F. Ivy, and Mariano "Mario" LettieriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Michael John ModenaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Eric C. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Empress Casino Joliet Corpora v. Balmoral Racing Club, IncorporCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. OltmannsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- United States v. SalgadoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. OltmannsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- United States v. Salgado, LauraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008