Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael John Modena
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 9, 2002No. 00-2477PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
Michael John Modena was convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States because of his participation in a tax-evasion scheme. He now appeals his conviction and sentence, arguing that (1) the district court failed to properly determine whether he knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to counsel, (2) the government improperly introduced evidence regarding his coconspirators’ convictions, (3) the government presented inadmissible summaries of the evidence, (4) the government engaged in prosecutorial misconduct, and (5) the district court imposed unjustified…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Richard CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Francis A. KoeberleinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- United States v. SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Noah Beverly Johnny P. Crockett Douglas A. TurnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. KuehneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. J. Richard JamiesonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Randall Cope and Terry Wayne CopeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.