Carrothers v. Beal
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOGAN, Judge.
Alleging themselves to be “members of a class known as the interested public, [a class] so numerous and widespread that it is impossible and impracticable to make all members a named party hereto” and further averring that they adequately represented “the interested public,” plaintiffs brought this injunction proceeding under the provisions of the Open Meetings Act, §§ 610.010-610.030, RSMo Supp.1975, also known as the “Sunshine Law.”
The cause was tried to the court, sitting without the aid of a jury, on July 17, 1975. Plaintiff Roseanne Helton Carrothers appeared and testified…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Donnell v. SearcySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Mudgett v. PetersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State ex rel. Fischer v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- State ex rel. Thompson v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grogan v. HaysMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Gilroy-Sims & Associates v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Monsanto Co. v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Morgan County v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State ex rel. Pulitzer Publishing Co. v. LohmarMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.