Legal Opinion

Carrothers v. Beal

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1978No. 10138PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

Alleging themselves to be “members of a class known as the interested public, [a class] so numerous and widespread that it is impossible and impracticable to make all members a named party hereto” and further averring that they adequately represented “the interested public,” plaintiffs brought this injunction proceeding under the provisions of the Open Meetings Act, §§ 610.010-610.030, RSMo Supp.1975, also known as the “Sunshine Law.”

The cause was tried to the court, sitting without the aid of a jury, on July 17, 1975. Plaintiff Roseanne Helton Carrothers appeared and testified…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Donnell v. SearcySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Mudgett v. PetersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. State ex rel. Fischer v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. State ex rel. Thompson v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grogan v. HaysMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Gilroy-Sims & Associates v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Monsanto Co. v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Morgan County v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Pulitzer Publishing Co. v. LohmarMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API