Mudgett v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMAN, Presiding Judge.
Appellant, Fred H. Mudgett (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff) has appealed from the judgment of the trial court denying his petition for release from Fulton State Hospital. We have appellate jurisdiction because the case involves issues which, if decided, would require a construction of certain constitutional provisions. Art. V, § 3, Mo.Const., V.A.M.S. We deem it advisa*473ble to state at the outset, however, that we will not decide this appeal on the merits because the case has been rendered moot by developments occurring since the appeal was taken. For that reason…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gershman Investment Corp. v. DanforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- Eicholz v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kinser v. ElkadiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Warren v. WarrenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- In the Interest of R. L. P.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Glover v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Carrothers v. BealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.