Legal Opinion
Grogan v. Hays
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 14, 1982No. WD 32102PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHANGLER, Presiding Judge.
The plaintiffs Grogan and Talley, individual practitioners of chiropractic under license by the Missouri Board of Chiropractic Examiners, sue for a declaratory judgment that certain rules and regulations of the Board promulgated to administer Chapter 311, RSMo 1978 and to implement the statutory definition of the practice of chiropractic [§ 331.010] exceed the scope of the statute and so are unlawful. They seek also to enjoin the Board permanently from enforcement of the promulgations. The office of the attorney general answered for the Board and denied the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Missouri Public Service Co. v. FraasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Euclid Terrace Corp. v. GOLTERMAN ENTERPRISES, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- State v. Local No. 8-6, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International UnionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Harkey v. MobleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bank of Washington v. McAuliffeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Monsanto Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Gilroy-Sims & Associates v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Dugger v. WelpMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- St. Louis County v. Village of Peerless ParkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.