DC Thompson and Co. v. Hauge
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*653LENT, J.
There are two issues. The first is whether failure to file a timely undertaking on appeal is a jurisdictional defect. The second is whether after a verdict is received and the jury is discharged, juror affidavits may be received and a new trial ordered based upon juror error in interpreting the effect of the verdict. As to the first issue, we hold that the untimely filing of the undertaking was not a jurisdictional defect. As to the second, we hold that such affidavits or testimony may not be received and thus may not serve as the basis for ordering a new trial.1
Plaintiff landlord…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Cyr v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Pittsburgh National Bank v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Carson v. BrauerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Schmitz v. YantOregon Supreme Court · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ertsgaard v. BeardOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. RamozOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. WoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Leland Properties, Inc. v. Burton Engineering & Survey Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Ertsgaard v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.