Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dearth v. Great Republic Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1992No. B055173PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J.

I

Introduction

Appellants, Carl A. Dearth and Kara Dearth (Dearths) brought the underlying action in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles against respondent Great Republic Life Insurance Company (Great Republic) and respondents David A. Nagler and Nagler & Nagler Insurance Agency (Nagler). The underlying action involves a policy of group health insurance (the Policy) issued by Great Republic to Dearth’s employer Pacemaker Enterprises Inc. (Pacemaker), a California corporation, covering Pacemaker’s employees.

Nagler acted as Great Republic’s agent in introducing…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Scott v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kurtz, Richards, Wilson & Co. v. Insurance Communicators Marketing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Hollingshead v. MatsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Dearth v. Great Republic Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Delilah Merfalen Gutierrez v. Glen Earl WhitleyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
  5. Perry v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API