Legal Opinion
Hollingshead v. Matsen
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1995No. Docket Nos. A064628, A064631PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Introduction
In these consolidated cases 1 plaintiffs Nyle G. Henderson and Diane Henderson and plaintiff Dianne Hollingshead, individually and as administrator of the estate of Raymond Styol Hollingshead, appeal following adverse summary judgments of the Humboldt County Superior Court finding plaintiffs’ claims preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and dismissing their claims against defendants Ralph Matsen, R.G. Matsen Insurance Agency, Inc., and Robert Burchitt, insurance brokers and agents. 2 We shall affirm the judgment.
Statement of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Donovan v. DillinghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Port Med. Wellness, Inc. v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Morris B. Silver M.D., Inc. v. International Longshore & Warehouse Union-Pacific Maritime Ass'n Welfare PlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Giannetti v. MahoneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Skillin v. Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Port Medical Wellness v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.