Legal Opinion

Lehigh Valley Transportation Services, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 2012PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

When J & J Leasing & Rentals, Inc., d/b/a Anytime Airport Taxi by J & J Luxury Transportation (J & J) requested that the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) add “call and demand taxi services” to its existing services, two competitors protested. After a hearing, an *52Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) approved the addition of these services, and the PUC subsequently denied the competitors’ exceptions. On appeal, we hold that the PUC did not err in finding that: (1) J & J met its burden of proving a present public need for the additional call and demand taxi…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public UtilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Samuel J. Lansberry, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Energy Conservation Council v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. O'TOOLE v. Braddock BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Yellow Cab Co. of Pittsburgh v. CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coalition for Affordable Utility Services & Energy Efficiency v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Rosemont Taxicab Co. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Mapemawa, Inc. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. J. Kline v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
  5. P. & C. Hughes v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API