Legal Opinion

Russum v. Bowser

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 31, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02035Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON MICHAEL JAMES RUSSUM, Case No. 2:18-cv-02035-AA Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. MR. T. BOWSER, Respondent. ___________________________ AIKEN, District Judge: Petitioner brings this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his sodomy convictions on grounds that he was denied his constitutional rights to counsel under the Sixth Amendment. The Oregon courts rejected his claims, and petitioner fails to overcome the deference this Court must afford those decisions. Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API