Legal Opinion

Peckham v. Henkel

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 21, 1910No. 366PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lurton

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court denying the application of the appellant to be discharged from arrest on a writ of habeas corpus and remanding him to the cus-tod}^ of the marshal.

The case differs from the cáse of Haas v. Henkel, just disposed of, only in certain particulars; otherwise it is governed by the opinion in that case.

1. Peckham is included in only two of the indictments against Haas, namely, Nos. 26,086 and 26,087. The first charges a conspiracy with Edwin 8. Holmes, Jr., and Moses Haas to defraud the United States; the other with a conspiracy with Haas, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. In Re JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Stallings v. SplainSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Morse v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Theodore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Bert Strand, Sheriff of San Diego County, State of California v. William SchmittrothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API