Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 7, 1969PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

Defendant was indicted for sodomy, under ORS 167.040, allegedly committed by bim on another prisoner in Multnomah County jail. .

In the first trial, for reasons not relevant here, á mistrial was declared. In this appeal, after conviction by a jury in the second trial, he raises several assignments of error, claiming a deprivation of his rights.

At two hearings held after the first and before the second trial, defendant demanded removal of court-appointed counsel and appointment of new counsel. No reason except lengthy generalizations about distrust of his lawyer was assigned for the request.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. State v. BrewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. BlodgettOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. SalazarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. EstlickOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API