Legal Opinion

Work v. United States ex rel. O'Donnell

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 7, 1927No. 4561PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

A peremptory writ of mandamus was issued by the court below to compel the appellant, Secretary of the Interior, to certify to the state of California for patent certain lands, under the Act of Congress of September 28, 1850 (9 Stat. 519 [43 USCA §§ 982-984; Comp. St. §§ 4958-4960]), alleged to be swamp and overflow in character.

The lands were surveyed in 1856 by authority of the state of California, and identified under the survey as “survey 34” containing 164.55 acres. Appellee, relator below, James E. O’Donnell, claims title to this tract of land through mesne…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Wright v. RoseberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Tubbs v. WilhoitSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Bonner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. San Francisco Sav. Union v. IrwinUnited States Circuit Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  2. United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  3. Stavros v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1932
  4. (PC) Kutterer v. Solano County JailDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Miller v. 4Internet, LLC.District Court, D. Nevada · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API