O'Donnell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court 1
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This case began in a bill filed by the United States for the cancellation of two patents granting certain swamp and overflowed lands in the State of California to that state, the patent from that state to one Darlington, and the successor deeds thereto, and for the quieting of the title of the United States against the successors in interest to California in the patented lands. The lands are a part of Mare Island, northwesterly of the main plant of the Mare Island Navy Yard. The District Court held for the United States, and this appeal followed.
Preceding the reasoning…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Field.
2Cases cited88 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Foster v. NeilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Minnesota v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Churchill County v. State EngineerNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- United States v. FornessDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941
- Charles H. Demarest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Mawhirt v. AhmedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.