Legal Opinion

San Francisco Sav. Union v. Irwin

United States Circuit Court

Decided July 8, 1886PublishedCited by 12 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is an action to recover possession of a tract of land situated partly in the county of Napa, and partly in the county of Solano, consisting of 7,413 acres and a fraction of an acre. It is alleged to be swamp and overflowed land, and that the title to it therefore passed to the state by the act of congress of September •28, 1850, “to enable the state of Arkansas and other states to reclaim the swamp lands within their limits.” 9 St. 519.

The first section of that act grants to the state of Arkansas “the whole of those swamp and overflowed lands, made unfit thereby for cultivation,” which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. French v. FyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Railroad Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Kernan v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Summers v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Owens v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Campbell v. YoungsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Miller v. Eastern Railway & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. O'Donnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. In Re Bailey's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Stewart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API