Legal Opinion

Updegraff v. Pennsylvania Game Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1948No. Appeal, 45PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

Harry J. Updegraff, wMle in tbe course of Ms employment as a game protector, suffered a coronary occlusion wbicb resulted in his death. His widow filed a claim for compensation on the ground that her husband’s death resulted from over-exertion in the course of his employment. The referee’s award of compensation was affirmed by the board and the court below and this appeal was taken by the State Workmen’s Insurance Fund.

The facts are undisputed. At about 2:30 p. m. on March 5, 1942, someone called at the Updegraff home and told the deceased that two dogs were chasing deer at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Paulin v. Williams Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Good v. Pennsylvania Department of Property & SuppliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Halaski v. Hilton HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Washko v. Ruckno, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Nelson v. Borough of GreenvilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Lemmon v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Shatto v. Bardinet Exports, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API