Legal Opinion

Harville v. Vanderbilt University, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 27, 2003No. 02-5077PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Ruth and Steven Harville, individually and on behalf of their minor child, Joseph Harville, filed suit against Defendants-Appellees Vanderbilt University (‘Vanderbilt”), Dr. Seth Scholer, Dr. Karen Crissinger, and Dr. Suzanne Starling, alleging violations of their civil rights, and claims for medical malpractice, malicious prosecution, abuse of legal process, outrageous conduct, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and emotional distress. As a result of various motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment, only the medical malpractice…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Francis Spadafore and Carol Spadafore v. Chet GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Dr. Martin TREPEL, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. Defendant-Appellee/Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Conwood Company, L.P. v. United States Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. King v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Patel v. GayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jesse A. Fielden v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Rogers v. Detroit Edison Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  3. Botnick v. Zimmer, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  4. Blythe v. SchlievertDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
  5. Adkins v. Marathon Petroleum Company LPDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API