Franzese v. Trinko
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld
Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his complaint for personal injuries which he had refiled within 1 year following the dismissal of his previous complaint for want of prosecution. He contends that the trial court erred in ruling that he had failed to comply with section 24 of the Limitations Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 83, par. 24a).
On May 1, 1972, plaintiff filed a complaint to recover for personal injuries allegedly suffered in an automobile accident on May 14,1970. On June 26, 1972, on defendant’s motion, the court entered a mutual production order. Plaintiff failed to respond…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roth v. Northern Assurance Co. Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Tidwell v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Keilholz v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Ray v. BokorneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Brown v. BurdickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Franzese v. TrinkoIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Gendek v. JehangirIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Kutnick v. GrantIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- LaBarge, Inc. v. Corn Belt BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Kristan v. Belmont Community HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.