Keilholz v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer
We granted leave to appeal in this case because it appeared to involve the inter-relationship of Rule 273 of this court and section 24 of the Limitations Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110A, par. 273; ch. 83, par. 24a). The rule relates to involuntary dismissals of actions, and it provides:
“Unless the order of dismissal or a statute of this State otherwise specifies, an involuntary dismissal of an action, other than a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, for improper venue, or for failure to join an indispensable party, operates as an adjudication upon the merits.” Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Keilholz v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
3Cited by26 opinions
- Nicholas Mares, Maria Mares, Adrian Mares v. Fred J. Busby, Jay Hackler, Joseph HodderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Sander v. Dow Chemical Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Farrokh Yassan v. J.P. Morgan ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Charles E. Andrews, Jr. v. Heinold Commodities, Inc., and Bill WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Wallace v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.