Legal Opinion

Keilholz v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1974No. 45886, 45888 consPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

We granted leave to appeal in this case because it appeared to involve the inter-relationship of Rule 273 of this court and section 24 of the Limitations Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110A, par. 273; ch. 83, par. 24a). The rule relates to involuntary dismissals of actions, and it provides:

“Unless the order of dismissal or a statute of this State otherwise specifies, an involuntary dismissal of an action, other than a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, for improper venue, or for failure to join an indispensable party, operates as an adjudication upon the merits.” Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keilholz v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Nicholas Mares, Maria Mares, Adrian Mares v. Fred J. Busby, Jay Hackler, Joseph HodderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Sander v. Dow Chemical Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Farrokh Yassan v. J.P. Morgan ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Charles E. Andrews, Jr. v. Heinold Commodities, Inc., and Bill WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Wallace v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API