People v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
Codefendants Gina Miller and Nicolas Harris appeal judgment after a jury convicted them of stealing over $150,000 by false pretenses from two elderly single men and then attempting to dissuade one of the victims from testifying against them. On appeal they challenge the admissibility and sufficiency of the evidence and the jury instructions. Miller also claims discriminatory prosecution. We affirm.
Facts
We view the record in the light most favorable to the People, as we are bound to do after a guilty verdict. (People v. Sweeney (1960) 55 Cal.2d 27, 33 [9 Cal.Rptr. 793, 357 P.2d…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. KarisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. CucciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Gallagher v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. HartleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Thorstrom v. ThorstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.