Favors v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
1. The rule has been laid down by the Supreme Court, and applied by this court, that sentences for criminal offenses “should be certain, definite, and free from ambiguity; and, where the contrary is the case, the benefit of the doubt should be given to the accused.” Dixon v. Baughn, 149 Ga. 86, 87 (99 S. E. 34); Cooley v. Dixon, 149 Ga. 506 (101 S. E. 181); Cross v. Huff, 208 Ga. 392 (67 S. E. 2d 124); Taylor v. State, 84 Ga. App. 852 (67 S. E. 2d 828); Fowler v. State, 85 Ga. App. 876 (70 S. E. 2d 599).
2. Under an application of the foregoing principles of law to the facts of the present…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cross v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Dixon v. BaughnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Cooley v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
3Cited by7 opinions
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Chase v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Dilas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Gilpatrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Dover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.