Legal Opinion

Budnitz' Case

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 23, 1995No. 93-003PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C. J.

The Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (committee) petitioned for the disbarment of the respondent, Arron E. Budnitz, alleging violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct (Rules). See SUP. Ct. R. 37(13). We referred the matter to a Judicial Referee (Dunn, J.) for a hearing. The referee determined that the respondent had violated Rules 3.3(a)(1), 3.3(a)(3), 8.1(a), 8.4(a) and 8.4(c). We agree that the respondent violated Rule 8.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact in connection with a disciplinary matter), find that this violation warrants disbarment, and,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Astles' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  2. Flint's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  3. Bourdon's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. Welts' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. Spead v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Basbanes' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  2. Morgan's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. Snow's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. Nardi's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  5. In re BudnitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API