Legal Opinion

Allen v. Layton

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided November 2, 1967PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUILLEN, Judge:

This is a malpractice suit against a surgeon and a hospital. The plaintiff has moved to strike the affirmative defense of the Statute of Limitations. Each defendant has moved for summary judgment. Because all motions deal with the same legal issue, they will be decided jointly.

For purposes of the defendants’ motions the following facts must be accepted. In 1958, the defendant surgeon operated on plaintiff in Kent General Hospital, code-fendant in this action. While the plaintiff was unconscious, the surgeon negligently left a hemostat in her body. The employees of the hospital…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nardone v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  3. United States v. Daniel I. Colton, United States of America v. Daniel I. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  4. Warrington v. Charles Pfizer & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Estate of Martha Barotz v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSBCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API