Legal Opinion

People v. Naranjo

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1987No. 85CA1184PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRISWELL, Judge.

Defendant, Sammy Naranjo, proceeding pro se, appeals an order of the trial court denying his motion for postconviction relief under Crim.P. 35(c). Because the trial court failed to appoint counsel for defendant or to hold a hearing on his motion, we vacate its order and remand for further proceedings.

In his original trial and appeal, defendant was represented by the public defender. The record reflects that, since that time, defendant has been continuously incarcerated. No suggestion has been made that he is no longer indigent and we assume, therefore, at the time he filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. People v. HubbardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. Roberts v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  4. People v. WimerColorado Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Richard S. Demarest v. William Price Gale Norton, Attorney General of the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. People v. NaranjoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. HickeyColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. DuranColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. People v. BreamanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API