Legal Opinion

People v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 4, 1974No. 25800PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

We are called upon in this appeal to provide standards to guide a trial court in deciding whether to grant a hearing to review allegations set forth in successive Crim. P. 35(b) motions for post-conviction relief.

The trial court ruled that the violations of constitutional rights which were alleged in Hubbard’s sixth motion for post-conviction relief were part of five previous Crim. P. 35(b) motions and that Hubbard was barred from seeking further relief under Crim. P. 35(b). We affirm for the reasons set forth in this opinion.

On July 18, 1962, an information was filed charging Hubbard with…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Richard S. Demarest v. William Price Gale Norton, Attorney General of the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. Palmer v. DermittIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Robbins v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API