Legal Opinion

Rainey v. City of Charlotte

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 2016No. COA15–953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELMORE, Judge.

*594The North Carolina Industrial Commission dismissed plaintiff's claim for benefits for an occupational disease, concluding that plaintiff failed to timely file his claim pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 97-59(c). We affirm.

*595I. Background

Ervin Rainey (plaintiff) worked as an automotive mechanic assistant for the City of Charlotte (defendant) for eighteen years, which required frequent strenuous use of his arms and shoulders. On 9 May 2000, plaintiff presented to Dr. H. Yates Dunaway, an orthopedic surgeon, for an evaluation of his right shoulder and knee. According to his medical…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Lucas v. Li'l General StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Taylor v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Richards v. Nationwide HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Dowdy v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rimmer v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  2. Rimmer v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API