Legal Opinion
Stark v. Flemming
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 23, 1959No. Civ. 38250PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEIGERT, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendant for summary judgment pursuant to F.R.Civ. P. rule 56, 28 U.S.CA.
The action was brought under Social Security Act, Sec. 205(g), 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) which provides for judicial review of final decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. The final decision of the Secretary presented for review in this action was a ruling to the effect that plaintiff was not entitled to old age benefits because she lacked a bona fide employment status, had not been paid “wages” and had acquired no coverage to qualify for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Thurston v. HobbyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
- Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States v. Helmer F. LindgrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- MacPherson v. EwingDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
- Rafal v. FlemmingDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States v. Helmer F. LindgrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Brannon v. RibicoffDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1961
- de Martinez v. GardnerDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1968