Legal Opinion

Fritchie v. Holden

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term. Action by Catherine Fritchie against Erastus F. Holden and others. Judgment was given for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.

The action was on an undertaking on appeal to the court of appeals. The appellant was the plaintiff in an action against one Buck-hard, and George and Catherine Fritchie, the latter being the plaintiff in this action. The facts appearing by the complaint and answer, all of which were admitted,—the former by express admission of the answer, and the latter by the demurrer,—were as follows: The action in which the appeal was taken was on a contract of guaranty, executed by the three defendants, to recover a debt of one Florack, alleged to be secured thereby. The defendants George and Catherine…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Water Commissioners of Amsterdam, ChalmersNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fischer v. BayerOregon Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API