Matter of Water Commissioners of Amsterdam, Chalmers
New York Court of Appeals
This was an appeal from an order of General Term, affirming an order of Special Term directing a retaxation of costs. This court reversed an order of General Term herein, confirming a report and award of commissioners, set aside the report “ with costs,” and directed a rehearing before new commissioners. The clerk taxed only costs of the Court of Appeals. The following is the mem. of opinion.
Read the full summary
This was an appeal from an order of General Term, affirming an order of Special Term directing a retaxation of costs. This court reversed an order of General Term herein, confirming a report and award of commissioners, set aside the report “ with costs,” and directed a rehearing before new commissioners. The clerk taxed only costs of the Court of Appeals. The following is the mem. of opinion. “In the case of The Sisters of Charity v. Kelly (68 N. Y. 628), we construed the words 1 with costs ’ in an order of reversal or affirmance in this court, in a case where the allowance of costs is…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
opinion for reversal of orders of General and Special Terms and the taxation of the clerk affirmed.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.
2Cited by12 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. BonnieNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Broadway Sav. Inst. of N.Y. v. . Town of PelhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Dooley v. AntonNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Fritchie v. HoldenNew York Supreme Court · 1890
- Broadway Sav. Inst. v. Town of PelhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.