Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Bayer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1922Published

1Opinion

On Objections to Cost Bill.

(211 Pac. 162.)

Mr. Harry G. Hoy and Mr. Paul W. Childers, for the objections.

Mr. C. A. Sheppard, contra.

BROWN, J.

Objection has been made to the cost bill filed on behalf of J. C. Bayer, trustee, and Eastern Irrigation, Power and Lumber Company, a corporation.

*320Respondent'objects to item — “Premium on bond, two years at $28: $56.” upon the ground that the same is not a chargeable item in the cost bill, there being “no provision therefor under the laws of this state. ’ ’

The law of this state is otherwise. Paragraph 5, Section 25-a, Chapter 203, General Laws of Oregon,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Apex Transportation Co. v. GarbadeOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Everding & Farrell v. ToftOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Stivers v. ByrkettOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hood v. MathisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API