United States Ex Rel. Harrison v. Pace
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FOGEL, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment which raise the dual issues, first, of the duty of defendants to disclose the reasons for their denial of plaintiff’s parole application in April, 1972, and, second, of their monetary liability in damages for that denial of parole in the first instance, and for their subsequent and continuing refusal to disclose the reasons for their actions. Our analysis of the facts and the controlling legal principles dictates entry of an order granting summary judgment in defendants’ favor on both…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Richerson v. Dennis Wolff, Warden, Sheridan Institution, and the Illinois Parole and Pardon BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Altimus v. Manhood Foundation, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Gaballah v. RoudebushDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
- Haymes v. ReganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975