Legal Opinion

United States v. Hotchkiss

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 3, 1945No. 20615PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

In this case the defendants were indicted for (1) having in possession and control a 75-gallon unregistered distilling apparatus; (2) carrying on the business of a distiller in spirits with intent to defraud the United States of the tax thereon and (3) making and fermenting mash, to wit, 240 gallons of fruit mash, fit for distillation for the production of spirits on premises which were not a distillery duly authorized according to law. These offenses are classed as felonies. The defendants filed a motion to suppress the evidence with respect to the search and seizure…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Nathanson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. McBride v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Railroad Passenger v. Veolia Transportation Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. State v. ChinnOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. ChinnOregon Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API