Legal Opinion
Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Gleave
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 2, 1982No. CIV-82-352EPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
ELFVIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ashland Oil, Inc. (“Ashland”) has moved in this action to recover damages resulting from alleged violations of 28 U.S.C. § 1962 for a preliminary injunction restraining defendants Gleave, 747 Kenmore, Inc. (Gleave’s business) and Mathews from disposing of or transferring their tangible assets or property without further order of this court priorly approving such disposition or transfer. Ashland insists that such restraint is necessary to prevent defendants from frustrating any judgment that may eventually be recovered against them in this…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- William CAULFIELD Et Al., Appellants, v. the BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF NEW YORK Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Productos Carnic, S.A., a Nicaraguan Corporation v. Central American Beef and Seafood Trading Company, a Florida Corporation v. United States Cold Storage, an Unincorporated Division of American Consumer Industries, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Treasure Salvors, Inc. v. The Unidentified Wrecked And Abandoned Sailing Vessel, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Cortright v. ResorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Fredeman Litigation. Dixie Carriers, Inc. v. Channel Fueling Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
- Religious Technology Center v. WollersheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc. United General Marketing, Inc., Classic Sales, Inc., Charles W. Jones and Robert E. Lee, Defendants-Crossclaim- General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim- Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, Iii, William J. Purvis, William L. Sikkelee and Consolidated Trading Co., Joseph Lee Smith, Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, United States of America, Movants. Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, William J. Purvis and William L. Sikkelee, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, United States of America, MovantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Kaushal v. State Bank of IndiaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.