Austin v. Austin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
As part of the parties’ judgment of divorce nisi, a Probate and Family Court judge held an antenuptial agreement (agreement) was invalid only insofar as it precluded the wife from receiving alimony. The husband appealed from the judgments, including the judge’s award of alimony to the wife, and the Appeals Court affirmed. Austin v. Austin, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 719 (2004). We granted the husband’s application for further appellate review, limited to the enforceability of the agreement. Because we conclude that the agreement was valid at the time it was executed and fair and reasonable at the time…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rice v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Schrottman v. BarnicleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Osborne v. OsborneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Rosenberg v. LipnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- DeMatteo v. DeMatteoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jodi Lynn Erpelding v. Timothy John ErpeldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Vakil v. VakilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Abbott v. VirussoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Eyster v. PechenikMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Rostanzo v. RostanzoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.