Legal Opinion
Vakil v. Vakil
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 11, 2008PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.
Amanollah Homayoun Vakil (husband) and Guiti Adjami Vakil (wife) have been married to each other twice and are in the process of obtaining their second divorce. One day before their second marriage in 1996, the parties executed an ante-nuptial agreement (antenuptial agreement, or agreement). Included in the agreement’s terms is a provision that states, “[the wife] *412shall not at any time make any claim or demand upon the [husband’s] estate for periodic alimony, spousal support, or separate maintenance or demand to be supported by the [husband] in any manner or upon any condition if she contests…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Castellucci v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Sharon v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Goulet v. Whitin MacHine Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Osborne v. OsborneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Roe No. 1 v. Children's Hospital Medical CenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Metro West Medical Associates, Inc. v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Brown v. Sav. Bank Life Ins. Co. of Mass.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Geofredo v. Starwood Capital Group, LLCMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
- Howard Physical Therapy, Inc. v. Premier InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.