Legal Opinion

Medeiros v. Soares

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1936No. Civ. 10164PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

From a judgment awarding the plaintiff damages for injuries suffered in an automobile collision the defendant has appealed.

At about sunset on the evening of July 8, 1934, the defendant was driving southeast on the Bay Shore highway near Palo Alto. About the same time the plaintiff was driving southwest on University Avenue. In the intersection of' those roads their cars collided and for injuries suffered the plaintiff commenced this action.

The defendant contends that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. That contention is based on the claim that at a time when he was blinded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Rogers v. Interstate Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Lindenbaum v. BarbourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. In Re Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sitkei v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Pattisson v. CavanaghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Collier v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Gulley v. DaggettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Laird v. T. W. Mather, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API