Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ryals v. . Contracting Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSeawell, J.

Civil action for recovery for injury allegedly resulting from actionable negligence of defendant.

In the trial court, the evidence, briefly stated, tends to show that on 12 October, 1938, the date of injury to plaintiff, U.S. Highway No. 301 — also numbered U.S. 70 — between Smithfield and Selma in this State, had an old paved surface 18 feet in width; that defendant was engaged in constructing an additional strip of concrete 6 feet wide along and adjoining the west edge of said old pavement, and had finished same with exception of space 40 to 60 to 100 feet at the point where Buffalo Creek…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. State v. . MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. State v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. Spencer v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Williams v. Eastern Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lewis v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Citizens National Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. State v. . SpruillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Hawkins Ex Rel. Hawkins v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Brannon v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API