Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. . Merrick

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 12, 1916PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClark, C. J.

The evidence on the part of the State showed that on 31 August, 1915, deceased was killed by a gunshot wound, intentionally inflicted by defendant. There was no testimony offered by defendant, and, on the facts in evidence, the jury rendered a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree. Sentence imposing the death penalty, and defendant appealed and, pursuant to exceptions duly entered, among other things, made assignments of error in effect as follows:

1. That the court in its charge to the jury entirely failed to present the question of manslaughter, when there were facts in evidence…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Maher v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Simmons v. Davenport.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Carleton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. State v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API