Legal Opinion
Schulz, Davis & Warren v. Marinkovich
Montana Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1983No. 82-190PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy
Appeal by George T. Marinkovich, Ann C. Marinkovich, and M & M Enterprises, from a judgment entered by the District Court, Fifth Judicial District, Beaverhead County, sitting without a jury, awarding wage claims, penalties and attorneys fees to various parties in the action, and from a judgment of general damages against George T. Marinkovich and Ann C.Marinkovich, in favor of Patricia M. Ori.
M & M Enterprises was incorporated in 1969. It had four stockholders, each with 125 shares of stock, namely George T. Marinkovich, Ann C. Marinkovich, Allie McFadden and *14her daughter, Patricia Ori. Upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nancy Anne Spangler, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Pasadena City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Central Tablet Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In Re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation. Neal Smith v. The National Provisioner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. 1,830.62 A. OF LAND IN BOTETOURT COUNTYDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1943
- Dietrich v. Steam Dredge & AmalgamatorMontana Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ostler v. BuhlerUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Utah Ass'n of Counties v. Tax Commission Ex Rel. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1995
- Preston v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Ostler v. BuhlerUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Schulz, Davis & Warren v. MarinkovichMontana Supreme Court · 1983