Legal Opinion

Schulz, Davis & Warren v. Marinkovich

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1983No. 82-190Published

1Opinion of the Court

661 P.2d 5 (1983)

SCHULZ, DAVIS & WARREN, a partnership, et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

George P. MARINKOVICH, et al., Third-party plaintiff.

George P. MARINKOVICH, et al., Third Party Plaintiff,

v.

M & M ENTERPRISES, a Mont. Corp., Third Party Defendant.

Dominic C. ORI, an individual and Patricia M. Ori, individually and as a shareholder and liquidating director of M & M Enterprises, Third Party Plaintiffs and Cross-Complainant,

v.

M & M ENTERPRISES, a Mont. Corp., Third Party Defendant, and

George P. Marinkovich, et al., Cross-Defendants.

No. 82-190.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Submitted on Briefs…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nancy Anne Spangler, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Pasadena City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Central Tablet Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. In Re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation. Neal Smith v. The National Provisioner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Gilna v. BarkerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Rohr v. Stanton Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API