Legal Opinion

Bacon v. Hart

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 13, 1862PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiéf Juatice TANEY.

We have looked into'this re- '. cord, arid find that the writ of error must be dismissed. The . action was in the nature of. an ejectment, arid brought to re"eov-er possession of land. The plaintiff, below, was William .Hart, junior, a citizen of New York, residing at Manilla. His counsel in the cause was William Hart, senior. In March, 1858,-judgment was rendered by the coui’t for the plaintiff. In October of.the same year a writ of error was sued out, returnable on the first Monday in December next thereafter, and ■service of the citation .was on the 9th of October…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tripp v. Santa Rosa Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. McFadden v. Mountain View Min. & Mill. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  3. Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  4. Bigler v. WallerSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Hawaii County v. Halawa Plantation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API