Bacon v. Hart
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chiéf Juatice TANEY.
We have looked into'this re- '. cord, arid find that the writ of error must be dismissed. The . action was in the nature of. an ejectment, arid brought to re"eov-er possession of land. The plaintiff, below, was William .Hart, junior, a citizen of New York, residing at Manilla. His counsel in the cause was William Hart, senior. In March, 1858,-judgment was rendered by the coui’t for the plaintiff. In October of.the same year a writ of error was sued out, returnable on the first Monday in December next thereafter, and ■service of the citation .was on the 9th of October…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Tripp v. Santa Rosa Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McFadden v. Mountain View Min. & Mill. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Bigler v. WallerSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Hawaii County v. Halawa Plantation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.