Campbell v. Great Miami Aerie No. 2309
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The issue presented is whether there was an implied easement upon the property of appellant to accept the flow of sewage from appellee’s adjoining property so that it could be discharged into appellant’s sewage system. Upon this record, we hold that the lower courts committed error in finding that there existed an implied easement.
This court has previously recognized that an easement may be created by specific grant, prescription, or implication which may arise from the particular set of facts and circumstances. Yeager v. Tuning (1908), 79 Ohio St. 121; Ciski v. Wentworth (1930), 122 Ohio St.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trattar v. RauschOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Ciski v. WentworthOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Frate v. RimenikOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Renner v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Benninghoff v. SkinnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cadwallader v. ScovannerOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Dunn v. RansomOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Fitzpatrick v. PalmerOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Shangrila Ohio, L.L.C. v. Westbridge Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Yowonske v. MDB Constr. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.