Legal Opinion

Wilmoth v. Ann Sacks Tile and Stone, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 3, 2008No. 030910094; A127861PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against her former employer, Ann Sacks Tile & Stone, Inc. (ASTS), and its parent company, Kohler Co. She alleged that defendants discriminated against her on the basis of sexual orientation and terminated her employment in retaliation for her complaints about unlawful discrimination. A jury found for defendants on plaintiffs unlawful discharge claim under the Portland City Code and her common-law wrongful discharge claim. Her discrimination claim under ORS 659A.030 was tried to the court, pursuant to ORS 659A.885, and, although the court ruled in defendants’…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Venture Properties, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. CartwrightOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. McDougal v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Migis v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Steele v. MayoralCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Marlow v. City of SistersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Washington County v. QuerbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API